Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violations
Login

Filing Number:     786956
Filing Accepted:  10/15/2024
         Print Filing
Complainant
Last/Business Name *  
STENNETT   First Name   JOHNEESE
Street Address * 561 SOUTHWEST BAILEY TERRACE
City, State Zip * PORT ST. LUCIE, FL 34953
Email Address * JCANAMI@ICLOUD.COM
Complainant Type: * Insured
Insured
Last/Business Name*   STENNETT   First Name   JOHNEESE
Policy # * KIN-HO-258806199 Claim #* HO-0004158
Attorney
Attorney is Applicable
Last Name* MCLESTER First Name * MINDY Initial
Street Address* 350 NORTH LAKE DESTINY ROAD
City, State Zip* MAITLAND , FLORIDA 32751
Email Address * MMCLESTER@ITSABOUTJUSTICE.LAW
Violation
Insurer Type *   Authorized Insurer Unauthorized Insurer
 
Insurer Name*   KIN INTERINSURANCE NETWORK
NAIC Company Code 16603
 
Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):* ANY ADJUSTER, MANAGER, OR INDIVIDUAL INVOLVED IN THE HANDLING OF THE SUBJECT CLAIM ON BEHALF OF THE INSURANCE CARRIER.
Type of Insurance * Residential Property & Casualty   
Reason for Notice *
Claim Denial
Claim Delay
Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer
Unfair Trade Practice
* Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
 
624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
626.9541(1)(i)(2) A material misrepresentation made to an insured or any other person having an interest in the proceeds payable under such contract or policy, for the purpose and with the intent of effecting settlement of such claims, loss, or damage under such contract or policy on less favorable terms than those provided in, and contemplated by, such contract or policy.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information.
626.9541(1)(i)(4) Failing to pay undisputed amounts of partial or full benefits owed under first-party property insurance policies within 60 days after an insurer receives notice of a residential property insurance claim, determines the amounts of partial or full benefits, and agrees to coverage, unless payment of the undisputed benefits is prevented by factors beyond the control of the insurer as defined in s. 627.70131(5).
* Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

A certified copy of the policy is not in the possession of the Insureds, but has been requested from the insurance carrier. Based on information and belief, the following policy provisions are relevant to this civil remedy notice.: Section 1 – Coverage A – Perils Insured Against Section 1- Conditions – Loss Settlement Section 1 – Conditions - Loss Payment
 
* Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

On or about January 16, 2022, the Insured, Johneese Stennett, suffered significant damage to his home located at 561 Southwest Bailey Terrace, Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 as a result of a severe hailstorm. Prior to the loss, Kin Interinsurance Network (“Kin”), had issued a policy of insurance (Policy No.: KIN-HO-258806199) for the Insured’s property. Said policy was in full force and effect on date of loss and afforded coverage for wind and hail damage. Kin was notified of the loss by the Insured and assigned claim number HO-0004158. During the course of Kin’s investigation, the Insured made the property available for inspection, provided facts and information surrounding the loss, and complied with Kin’s adjustment of the claim. Despite fully cooperating with Kin’s investigation, Kin capriciously denied coverage for the Insured’s insurance claim even though there was clear evidence of wind and hail damage to the roof. Kin came to its coverage determination by ignoring relevant facts and information provided by the Insured and his contractors that established the damages were unquestionably the result of wind and hail. Most concerning, Kin and its representatives either underplayed or misrepresented the findings from its own inspections in order to avoid having to tender payment on a claim that it knows should be covered pursuant to the terms of the policy. It is clear that Kin has not acted honestly or fairly towards its Insured. Kin and its representatives have failed to conduct a proper investigation of the loss, misrepresented the scope and cause of damages at the residence, and misapplied exclusions in the policy in order to deny coverage for the Insured’s claim. It has become a general business practice of Kin to not implement proper claims handling procedures, to hire consultants that routinely ignore or intentionally misidentify relevant evidence, and to not settle claims in good faith when under all circumstances it should have. As is the case here, it is a pattern and practice for Kin to arbitrarily deny claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon information and evidence available to it. In order to cure this civil remedy notice, Kin must immediately acknowledge in writing that the roof, interior, and exterior damages claimed by the Insureds were caused by wind and hail and immediately tender the full payment owed to the Insureds for damage to covered property in the amount of $144,391.42 less the applicable deductible. The written acknowledgement should be provided to the Insured’s counsel in writing at Mindy Mclester, Esq. at 350 N. Lake Destiny Road, Suite 300, Maitland, FL 32751.
Comments
User Id Date Added Comment
kristen.henderson@kin.com 12-09-2024 While Kin Interinsurance Network believes that the Civil Remedy Notice fails to comply with the requirements of Florida Statute §624.155 and Florida Case law, it has responded to the Notice in writing to Mindy McLester on December 9, 2024. Pursuant to F.S. 624.155(3)(d), please accept this notice on the disposition of the alleged violations contained in the Civil Remedy Notice occurred on November 14, 2024.
Acknowledgement
* The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed or deleted.




DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008