Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violations
Login

Filing Number:     787735
Filing Accepted:  10/21/2024
         Print Filing
Complainant
Last/Business Name *  
ELECTRONIC DISPLAY NETWORKS   First Name  
Street Address * 1306 EAST CERVANTES STREET
City, State Zip * PENSACOLA, FL 32501
Email Address * SERVICE@LRLC.LEGAL
Complainant Type: * Insured
Insured
Last/Business Name*   ELECTRONIC DISPLAY NETWORKS   First Name  
Policy # * JTA2500218 Claim #* 1030973
Attorney
Attorney is Applicable
Last Name* STERN First Name * ALEX Initial
Street Address* 16375 NE 18TH AVE., STE. 321
City, State Zip* NORTH MIAMI BEACH , FLORIDA 33162
Email Address * ALEX@LRLC.LEGAL
Violation
Insurer Type *   Authorized Insurer Unauthorized Insurer
 
Insurer Name*   UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
NAIC Company Code
 
Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):* LYNN ROTHMAN, JOHNNY WALKER, RICHARD E. ZELONKA, JR.
Type of Insurance * Commercial Property & Casualty   
Reason for Notice *
Claim Delay
Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer
Unfair Trade Practice
* Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
 
624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
626.9541(1)(i)(2) A material misrepresentation made to an insured or any other person having an interest in the proceeds payable under such contract or policy, for the purpose and with the intent of effecting settlement of such claims, loss, or damage under such contract or policy on less favorable terms than those provided in, and contemplated by, such contract or policy.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(e) Failing to affirm or deny full or partial coverage of claims, and, as to partial coverage, the dollar amount or extent of coverage, or failing to provide a written statement that the claim is being investigated, upon the written request of the insured within 30 days after proof-of-loss statements have been completed.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(g) Failing to promptly notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(h) Failing to clearly explain the nature of the requested information and the reasons why such information is necessary.
626.9541(1)(i)(4) Failing to pay undisputed amounts of partial or full benefits owed under first-party property insurance policies within 60 days after an insurer receives notice of a residential property insurance claim, determines the amounts of partial or full benefits, and agrees to coverage, unless payment of the undisputed benefits is prevented by factors beyond the control of the insurer as defined in s. 627.70131(5).
* Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

BUILDING AND PERSONAL PROPERTY COVERAGE FORM Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Read the entire policy carefully to determine rights, duties and what is and is not covered. Throughout this policy, the words "you" and "your" refer to the Named Insured shown in the Declarations. The words "we", "us" and "our" refer to the company providing this insurance. Other words and phrases that appear in quotation marks have special meaning. Refer to Section H. Definitions. A. Coverage We will pay for direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property at the premises described in the Declarations caused by or resulting from any Covered Cause of Loss. 1. Covered Property Covered Property, as used in this Coverage Part, means the type of property described in this section, A.1., and limited in A.2. Property Not Covered, if a Limit Of Insurance is shown in the Declarations for that type of property. a. Building, meaning the building or structure described in the Declarations, including: (1) Completed additions; (2) Fixtures, including outdoor fixtures; (3) Permanently installed: (a) Machinery; and (b) Equipment; (4) Personal property owned by you that is used to maintain or service the building or structure or its premises, including: (a) Fire-extinguishing equipment; (b) Outdoor furniture; (c) Floor coverings; and (d) Appliances used for refrigerating, ventilating, cooking, dishwashing or laundering; (5) If not covered by other insurance: (a) Additions under construction, alterations and repairs to the building or structure; (b) Materials, equipment, supplies and temporary structures, on or within 100 feet of the described premises, used for making additions, alterations or repairs to the building or structure. b. Your Business Personal Property consists of the following property located in or on the building or structure described in the Declarations or in the open (or in a vehicle) within 100 feet of the building or structure or within 100 feet of the premises described in the Declarations, whichever distance is greater: (1) Furniture and fixtures; (2) Machinery and equipment; (3) "Stock"; (4) All other personal property owned by you and used in your business; (5) Labor, materials or services furnished or arranged by you on personal property of others; (6) Your use interest as tenant in improvements and betterments. Improvements and betterments are fixtures, alterations, installations or additions: (a) Made a part of the building or structure you occupy but do not own; and (b) You acquired or made at your expense but cannot legally remove; (7) Leased personal property for which you have a contractual responsibility to insure, unless otherwise provided for under Personal Property Of Others. ... E. Loss Conditions The following conditions apply in addition to the Common Policy Conditions and the Commercial Property Conditions: ... 2. Appraisal If we and you disagree on the value of the property or the amount of loss, either may make written demand for an appraisal of the loss. In this event, each party will select a competent and impartial appraiser. The two appraisers will select an umpire. If they cannot agree, either may request that selection be made by a judge of a court having jurisdiction. The appraisers will state separately the value of the property and amount of loss. If they fail to agree, they will submit their differences to the umpire. A decision agreed to by any two will be binding. Each party will: a. Pay its chosen appraiser; and b. Bear the other expenses of the appraisal and umpire equally. ... 4. Loss Payment a. In the event of loss or damage covered by this Coverage Form, at our option, we will either: (1) Pay the value of lost or damaged property; (2) Pay the cost of repairing or replacing the lost or damaged property, subject to b. below; (3) Take all or any part of the property at an agreed or appraised value; or (4) Repair, rebuild or replace the property with other property of like kind and quality, subject to b. below. We will determine the value of lost or damaged property, or the cost of its repair or replacement, in accordance with the applicable terms of the Valuation Condition in this Coverage Form or any applicable provision which amends or supersedes the Valuation Condition. b. The cost to repair, rebuild or replace does not include the increased cost attributable to enforcement of or compliance with any ordinance or law regulating the construction, use or repair of any property. c. We will give notice of our intentions within 30 days after we receive the sworn proof of loss. ... FLORIDA CHANGES ... D. The Loss Payment Condition dealing with the number of days within which we must pay for covered loss or damage is replaced by the following: Provided you have complied with all the terms of this Coverage Part, we will pay for covered loss or damage upon the earliest of the following: (1) Within 20 days after we receive the sworn proof of loss and reach written agreement with you; (2) Within 30 days after we receive the sworn proof of loss and: (a) There is an entry of a final judgment; or (b) There is a filing of an appraisal award with us; or (3) Within 90 days of receiving notice of claim, unless we deny the claim during that time or factors beyond our control reasonably prevent such payment. If a portion of the claim is denied, then the 90-day time period for payment of claim relates to the portion of the claim that is not denied. Paragraph (3) applies only to the following: (a) A claim under a policy covering residential property; (b) A claim for building or contents coverage if the insured structure is 10,000 square feet or less and the policy covers only locations in Florida;
 
* Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

This Civil Remedy Notice is brought against Certain Underwriter’s at Lloyd’s, London (“Carrier”) for violations of Florida law, including but not limited to Fla. Stat. § 624.155 and Fla. Stat. § 626.9541, resulting from the Carrier's bad faith handling of a claim for windstorm damage arising from Hurricane Sally. The Carrier’s conduct throughout the claim process exhibits a deliberate and unjustifiable failure to act in good faith toward its insured, Electronic Display Networks, Inc. (“Policyholder”), who has been significantly harmed by the Carrier’s delays, underpayments, and refusal to comply with the terms of the Policy. Carrier issued insurance policy number JTA2501130 (the “Policy”) to Policyholder. The Policy provides insurance coverage for a residential property owned by Policyholder located 1306 East Cervantes Street, Pensacola, Florida 32501 (the “Property”). The Policy is an “all-risks” policy meaning all loss is covered by the Policy unless specifically excluded. The Policy expressly provides coverage for loss caused by windstorm. The Policy required Carrier pay for loss covered by the Policy “upon the earliest” of various scenarios, with the applicable on here being within 90 days of the loss’s involving a residential property or a property which is less than 10,000 square feet. The Policy requires Carrier give notice of its intentions within 30 days after receiving a sworn proof of loss. The Policy also contains a mandatory appraisal clause, requiring each party to submit to an appraisal of the loss upon the demand of either party. On or about September 16, 2020, Policyholder’s Property experienced loss covered by the Policy from Hurricane Sally causing damage to the Property’s exterior, interior, and roofing system. Policyholder timely reported the loss to Carrier who assigned claim number 1030973 (the “Claim”) in recognition of its coverage obligations. Because Policyholder reported the loss on December 18, 2020, the Policy required Carrier to make full payment for the loss no later than March 18, 2021. Policyholder substantially complied with all of the Policy’s applicable post-loss conditions including making the Property available for multiple inspections. Carrier inspected the property and acknowledged coverage for the loss but underpaid the claim by only issuing a payment of $1,317.82 after application of the $7,500 windstorm deductible. This amount was grossly inadequate to compensate for the damages sustained, as later evidenced by the appraisal award. Policyholder then retained a public adjuster to dispute the significant disparity in the valuation of the loss. Policyholder incurred additional expenses in hiring a public adjuster that it would not have needed to pay but for Carrier’s failure to properly handle and pay the Claim. Carrier conducted another inspection of the Claim, this time with a different adjusting firm. After the reinspection, Carrier then reassigned the initial adjusting firm to the Claim without reason and without telling the original adjusting firm that a second adjusting firm had been hired and conducted a reinspection. After Carrier conducted a reinspection, Carrier did not issue any additional monies, reevaluate the amount of loss, conduct a further investigation, or reconsider its lowball estimate. Regardless, Policyholder continued to cooperate under the Policy and on January 10, 2023, Policyholder invoked the Policy’s appraisal provision, demanded an appraisal of the loss, and provided a sworn proof of loss along with a competing estimate in accordance with the Policy’s terms. Carrier, however, failed to timely respond with notice of its intentions after receipt of the sworn proof of loss. In fact, Carrier ignored the insured's demand for appraisal for five months. Finally, in correspondence dated May 11, 2023, Carrier responded through counsel to Policyholder’s appraisal demand. Carrier’s correspondence refused to proceed with appraisal. Carrier asserted that there was no existing dispute between the parties despite Carrier’s receipt of a competing estimate and sworn proof of loss. Carrier and its counsel had already asserted this argument in other courts and lost but continued to use this specious argument to delay resolution of the Claim, the appraisal, or making any additional payment to Policyholder. The Carrier’s refusal to honor its obligation to engage in the appraisal process forced the insured to hire an attorney and enter into costly, unnecessary litigation, increasing the insured's damages and resulting in significant attorney's fees. Policyholder moved to compel appraisal which Carrier opposed. This time however, Carrier asserted Policyholder should not be entitled to an appraisal by baselessly accusing Policyholder of committing insurance fraud, a felony in the state of Florida. Even after the court granted the insured's motion to compel appraisal, the Carrier continued to delay resolution, further extending the timeframe for the insured to receive the full benefits owed under the Policy. This conduct clearly evidences the Carrier’s failure to implement proper procedures for the timely and proper investigation and handling of claims. The appraisal process was finally completed on July 16, 2024, resulting in an award of $146,706.55, a figure drastically higher than the Carrier’s initial underpayment. Even the Carrier's own appraiser agreed to this higher award, confirming that the Carrier’s initial evaluation was a gross miscalculation of the true extent of the damage. Carrier still, however, refused to timely pay the appraisal award leading to additional litigation. The Carrier’s failure to promptly resolve the claim, to properly investigate the loss, and to engage in the appraisal process in a timely manner demonstrates a clear and intentional disregard for its duty to act fairly and in good faith toward its insured. These actions were in direct violation of Fla. Stat. § 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a), which prohibits insurers from failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims, as well as Fla. Stat. § 624.155(1)(b)(1), which requires insurers to act in good faith in attempting to settle claims. Even after the Court ordered Carrier to make payment, Carrier still failed to timely pay. Once Carrier did finally tender the appraisal award, Carrier failed to include interest on the past due payment. Although the appraisal award was eventually issued, the Carrier failed to timely pay the full appraisal award, requiring the insured to file additional motions to enforce payment. Even when the Carrier finally issued the payment, it failed to include interest on the delayed payment, further compounding the harm caused to the insured. To make matters worse, the insured was in the process of attempting to sell the property, but the sale fell through due to the extent of the storm damage and the Carrier’s persistent failure to promptly and adequately compensate the insured for the loss. The Carrier's delay in properly paying the claim prevented the insured from repairing the property in time to complete the sale, causing further financial and emotional harm to the insured. The Carrier’s bad faith actions have caused significant financial harm to the insured by forcing the insured to retain legal counsel and incur attorney’s fees, all of which would have been avoidable had the Carrier timely and fairly handled the claim. The Carrier’s actions constitute a violation of Fla. Stat. § 624.155 (Bad Faith) and Fla. Stat. § 626.9541 (Unfair Trade Practices) and demonstrate a clear pattern of claim delay, failure to properly investigate, failure to settle in good faith, and failure to adhere to the obligations under the Policy. Had the Carrier acted in good faith, as required by Florida law, and properly investigated the claim, it would have reached the appropriate loss valuation at the outset and resolved the claim without forcing the insured into litigation. The Carrier’s handling of this claim was not only deficient but intentional in its delay and underpayment. The insured has been deprived of full use of their property for an extended period and has incurred additional costs, damages, and attorney’s fees directly as a result of the Carrier’s bad faith and unfair claims handling. The Carrier’s actions have caused significant additional loss to the insured and are in direct violation of Florida law. Carrier must: Pay the full amount of the appraisal award, including all interest accrued due to the delay. Reimburse the insured for all attorney’s fees and costs incurred as a direct result of the Carrier’s refusal to properly handle and settle the claim. Adopt and implement procedures for the prompt and timely investigation and settlement of claims to avoid future violations of Florida Statutes. Ensure that all future claims handling complies with Fla. Stat. § 624.155 and Fla. Stat. § 626.9541 to prevent similar occurrences. Carrier failed to abide by the duties owed its Policyholder, committed unfair insurance trade practices, and violated Florida Statute Section 624.155 by, for example, not making good faith efforts to settle the claim when under the circumstances Carrier could and should have done so had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for Policyholder’s interests because; by making claims payments to insureds or beneficiaries not accompanied by a statement setting forth the coverage under which payments are being made; by failing to promptly settle claims when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage; by making a material misrepresentation to Policyholder for the purpose and with the intent of effecting settlement of such claims, loss, or damage under such contract or policy on less favorable terms than those provided in, and contemplated by, such contract or policy; and by failing to pay undisputed amounts of partial or full benefits owed under this first-party property insurance Policy within 90 days after an Carrier received notice of the Claim, properly determined the amounts of partial or full benefits, and agreed to coverage because Carrier failed to pay the full amounts due and owing under the Policy within 90 days of the Claim being reported. Moreover, Carrier fails to abide by the duties owed its policyholders, commits unfair insurance trade practices, and violates Florida Statute Section 624.155 with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice by, for example, failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims because in multiple instances including this Claim Carrier failed to conduct a thorough and proper investigation by failing to conduct an investigation designed to discover facts beneficial to Policyholder; misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue by not providing policyholders fair and adequate explanation of the coverages available, not explaining to policyholders the benefits available under an all-risks policy; failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims by not responding to policyholders’ submission of documents and requests for information; denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information; failing to affirm or deny full or partial coverage of claims, and, as to partial coverage, the dollar amount or extent of coverage, or failing to provide a written statement that the claim is being investigated, upon the written request of the insured within 30 days after proof-of-loss statements have been completed; failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement; failing to promptly notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim; or failing to clearly explain the nature of the requested information and the reasons why such information is necessary. To remedy the violations described herein, Carrier must unconditionally tender all amounts due to Policyholder, including interest, lost profits for the sale, lost rents, and attorney’s fees and costs, made payable to Policyholder and Policyholder’s attorney.
Comments
User Id Date Added Comment
rzelonka@wshblaw.com 12-20-2024 Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Subscribing to Policy No. JTA2500218 (“Underwriters”), which was issued to Electronic Display Networks, Inc. (“EDN") for the period August 2, 2020 to August 2, 2021 (the “Policy”), dispute and reject each and every allegation contained within the October 21, 2024 Civil Remedy Notice (Filing Number 787735). The Civil Remedy Notice alleges claim delay, unsatisfactory settlement offer, and unfair trade practice related to alleged wind and water damage to the commercial property located at 1306 E. Cervantes Street, Pensacola, FL 32501 (the "Property") occurring on or about September 16, 2020. The Civil Remedy Notice seeks “interest on the past due payment” in the amount of $137,888.73 as well as “lost profits for the [property’s] sale, lost rents, and attorney’s fees and costs” arising out of the alleged untimely payment of the $137,888.73 appraisal award. The Civil Remedy Notice, however, does not include an amount needed to cure the alleged violations. To be clear, Underwriters state that they timely investigated and adjusted all claims with their insured and reject any allegation that they have acted in bad faith or otherwise committed any of the acts outlined in the Civil Remedy Notice. Underwriters tendered $137,888.73 to their insured on September 4, 2024 following completion of the appraisal of the loss and the claim. For further response, Underwriters’ counsel has previously requested that EDN provide an explanation as to what fees and interest it contends are owed as EDN has never made a claim for fees in this case and as the Court never determined entitlement to fees or an amount owed. Underwriters never received a response. Consequently, Underwriters state that EDN’s Civil Remedy Notice is defective and fails to comply with Florida law.
Acknowledgement
* The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed or deleted.




DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008