Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violations
Login

Filing Number:     793302
Filing Accepted:  11/19/2024
         Print Filing
Complainant
Last/Business Name *  
MUNOZ   First Name   DAVID
Street Address * 2218 STONEMILL DRIVE
City, State Zip * ORLANDO, FL 32837
Email Address * EFRB@ME.COM
Complainant Type: * Insured
Insured
Last/Business Name*   MUNOZ   First Name   DAVID
Policy # * NP1085870 Claim #* HO0001047034
Attorney
Attorney is Applicable
Last Name* LEWIS First Name * REBECCA Initial
Street Address* 708 E. COLONIAL DR., SUITE 103
City, State Zip* ORLANDO , FL 32803
Email Address * RL@WEKLAW.COM
Violation
Insurer Type *   Authorized Insurer Unauthorized Insurer
 
Insurer Name*   STILLWATER INSURANCE COMPANY
NAIC Company Code 25180
 
Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):* UNKNOWN
Type of Insurance * Residential Property & Casualty   
Reason for Notice *
Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer
Claim Denial
Unfair Trade Practice
* Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
 
624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
* Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

AGREEMENT We will provide the insurance described in this policy in return for the premium and compliance with all applicable provisions of this policy. SECTION I – PROPERTY COVERAGES A. Coverage A – Dwelling 1. We cover: a. The dwelling on the "residence premises" shown in the Declarations, including structures attached to the dwelling; and b. Materials and supplies located on or next to the "residence premises" used to construct, alter or repair the dwelling or other structures on the "residence premises". 2. We do not cover land, including land on which the dwelling is located. B. Coverage B – Other Structures 1. We cover other structures on the "residence premises" set apart from the dwelling by clear space. This includes structures connected to the dwelling by only a fence, utility line, or similar connection. SECTION I – PERILS INSURED AGAINST A. Coverage A – Dwelling And Coverage B – Other Structures 1. We insure against risk of sudden and accidental direct physical loss to property described in Coverages A and B. D. Loss Settlement In this Condition D., the terms "cost to repair or replace" and "replacement cost" do not include the increased costs incurred to comply with the enforcement of any ordinance or law, except to the extent that coverage for these increased costs is provided in E.11. Ordinance Or Law under Section I – Property Coverages. Covered property losses are settled as follows: 1. Property of the following types: a. Personal property; b. Awnings, carpeting, household appliances, outdoor antennas and outdoor equipment, whether or not attached to buildings; c. Structures that are not buildings; and d. Grave markers, including mausoleums; at actual cash value at the time of loss but not more than the amount required to repair or replace. 2. Buildings covered under Coverage A or B at replacement cost without deduction for depreciation, subject to the following: a. If, at the time of loss, the amount of insurance in this policy on the damaged building is 80% or more of the full replacement cost of the building immediately before the loss, we will pay the cost to repair or replace, without deduction for depreciation, but not more than the least of the following amounts: (1) The limit of liability under this policy that applies to the building; (2) The replacement cost of that part of the building damaged with material of like kind and quality and for like use; or (3) The necessary amount actually spent to repair or replace the damaged building. If the building is rebuilt at a new premises, the cost described in (2) above is limited to the cost which would have been incurred if the building had been built at the original premises. b. If, at the time of loss, the amount of insurance in this policy on the damaged building is less than 80% of the full replacement cost of the building immediately before the loss, we will pay the greater of the following amounts, but not more than the limit of liability under this policy that applies to the building: (1) The actual cash value of that part of the building damaged; or (2) That proportion of the cost to repair or replace, without deduction for depreciation, that part of the building damaged, which the total amount of insurance in this policy on the damaged building bears to 80% of the replacement cost of the building. c. To determine the amount of insurance required to equal 80% of the full replacement cost of the building immediately before the loss, do not include the value of: (1) Excavations, footings, foundations, piers, or any other structures or devices that support all or part of the building, which are below the undersurface of the lowest basement floor; (2) Those supports described in (1) above which are below the surface of the ground inside the foundation walls, if there is no basement; and (3) Underground flues, pipes, wiring and drains. d. We will pay no more than the actual cash value of the damage until actual repair or replacement is complete. Once actual repair or replacement is complete, we will settle the loss as noted in 2.a. and b. above. However, if the cost to repair or replace the damage is both: (1) Less than 5% of the amount of insurance in this policy on the building; and (2) Less than $2,500; we will settle the loss as noted in 2.a. and b. above whether or not actual repair or replacement is complete. e. You may disregard the replacement cost loss settlement provisions and make claim under this policy for loss to buildings on an actual cash value basis. You may then make claim for any additional liability according to the provisions of this Condition D. Loss Settlement, provided you notify us, within 180 days after the date of loss, of your intent to repair or replace the damaged building. D. Loss Settlement In Form HO 00 03 The following is added to the last paragraph in paragraph 1: Actual cash value means the lesser of repair or replacement cost at the time of loss less applicable depreciation for physical deterioration and obsolescence. In Form HO 00 03 Paragraph 2.d. is replaced by the following: d. We will settle the loss as follows: We will settle the loss as noted in 2.a. and b. of this provision. If 2.a. is not applicable, we will settle the loss as follows: (1) We will initially pay the actual cash value of the building damage, minus any applicable deductible. (2) We will then pay the necessary amounts actually spent to repair or replace the damaged building as work is performed and expenses are incurred. (3) If a total loss, we will pay the replacement cost amount without deduction for depreciation. Actual cash value as used in b. (1) and d. means the lesser of repair or replacement cost at the time of the loss less applicable depreciation for physical deterioration and obsolescence. Paragraph 2.e. is deleted. In Form HO 00 06; Paragraph 2. is replaced by the following: 2. Coverage A - Dwelling, at the actual cost to repair or replace. In this provision, the terms "repaired" or "replaced" do not include the increased costs incurred to comply with the enforcement of any ordinance or law, except to the extent that coverage for these increased costs is provided in D.10. Ordinance Or Law under Section I - Property Coverages. J. Loss Payment We will adjust all losses with you. We will pay you unless some other person is named in the policy or is legally entitled to receive payment. Loss will be payable 60 days after we receive your proof of loss and: 1. Reach an agreement with you; 2. There is an entry of a final judgment; or 3. There is a filing of an appraisal award with us. I. Our Option is replaced by the following: I. Our Option In Form HO 00 03: If at the time of loss, the damaged property is: a. not insured for Replacement Cost Loss Settlement as outlined in Section I - Conditions, Loss Settlement, and we give you written notice within 30 days after we receive your signed, sworn proof of loss, we may repair or replace any part of the damaged property with material or property of like kind and quality. b. insured for Replacement Cost Loss Settlement as outlined in Section I - Conditions, Loss Settlement, we will pay the amount of loss as noted in Paragraph D.2.d.(1) of the Loss Settlement provision. If at the time of loss: a. The Personal Property Replacement Cost Loss Settlement – Florida endorsement is made a part of this Policy, we will pay the amount of loss as noted in Paragraph C. of that endorsement. In Forms HO 00 04 and HO 00 06: If at the time of loss: a. The Personal Property Replacement Cost Loss Settlement – Florida endorsement is not made a part of this Policy, and we give you written notice within 30 days after we receive your signed, sworn proof of loss, we may repair or replace any part of the damaged personal property with material or property of like kind and quality. b. The Personal Property Replacement Cost Loss Settlement – Florida endorsement is made a part of this Policy, we will pay the amount of loss as noted in Paragraph C. of that endorsement. J. Loss Payment is replaced by the following: J. Loss Payment We will adjust all losses with you. We will pay you unless some other person is named in the Policy or is legally entitled to receive payment. Loss will be payable upon the earliest of the following: 1. 20 days after we receive your proof of loss and reach written agreement with you; 2. 60 days after we receive your proof of loss and: a. There is an entry of a final judgment; or b. There is a filing of an appraisal award or a mediation settlement with us. 3. If payment is not denied, within 90 days after we receive notice of an initial, reopened or supplemental claim. However, this provision (J.3.) does not apply if factors beyond our control reasonably prevent such payment.
 
* Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

Patricia Santos and David Munoz ("Insureds") purchased an insurance policy ("Policy") from Stillwater Insurance Company ("Stillwater" or “Carrier”) with effective coverage on the date of loss, on or about September 28, 2022, and Policy number NP1085870 to insure their property located 2218 Stonemill Drive, Orlando, Florida 32837 (the "Property").?? On or about September 28, 2022, the Property suffered from extensive damages to the roof, exterior, and interior due to Hurricane Ian ("Loss"). Stillwater was notified of the Loss immediately upon discovery and was granted access to the property in order to complete their inspection. Stillwater acknowledged the claim and assigned claim HO0001047034 ("Claim") to the Loss. On or about October 14, 2022, Stillwater sent field adjuster, Tim Brissey, to inspect the subject property. As a result of the adjuster’s inspection, on October 28, 2022, Stillwater issued its claims decision for the Loss. As evidenced by an estimate sent to the Insureds, dated October 28, 2022, Stillwater determined the total value of the loss was $3,361.72 which was below the applicable deductible. However, Stillwater’s coverage determination failed to properly account for the money needed to repair the interior damages and improperly failed to pay for the replacement of this roof due to the extensive damage caused by Hurricane Ian. After Stillwater issued its coverage determination letter which stated the damages were below the deductible, the Insureds retained the services of a public adjuster. The Insureds’ public adjuster investigated and adjusted the loss and determined the total value of the loss to be $103,531.27. The Insureds, realizing that Stillwater’s adjustment of the loss was not a fair or an honest adjustment of the loss reached out to Stillwater in order to have it reconsider its position. On September 29, 2023, Stillwater sent field adjuster, Brett Rhodes, to inspect the subject property. As a result of the adjuster’s inspection, on October 3, 2023, Stillwater issued another claims decision for the Loss. This time they determined that the total value of the loss was $8,723.55 as evidenced by an estimate sent to the Insureds, dated October 2, 2023. Stillwater issued a payment to the Insureds in the amount of $3,201.00 after applying depreciation and applying the wrong deductible in the amount of $5,360.00. Pursuant to the subject policy, the deductible for hurricane losses is $4,960.00, not $5,360.00. Further, the payment failed to properly account for the money needed to repair the interior damages and improperly failed to pay for the replacement of the roof due to the extensive damage caused by Hurricane Ian. Neither estimate provided to the Insureds by Stillwater included any coverage for the damages to the roof caused by Hurricane Ian and neither coverage determination letter offered an explanation as to why coverage was being denied for the damages to the roof. Despite Stillwater being provided plenty of evidence (including photographs, comparative estimates and bids, and near immediate access to the property upon discovery of the loss) showing that a Hurricane so severely damaged this property that it will require repairs as well as a roof replacement, Stillwater continues to refuse to provide additional money in order to begin these repairs. Stillwater’s adjustment of the loss was not a fair or an honest adjustment of the loss. Stillwater’s adjustment of the loss was intended to provide the illusion of a fair adjustment, to avoid full payment to the Insureds. Stillwater knows or should know that its adjustment of the Loss is not a fair or honest assessment of the Loss, yet Stillwater has refused to attempt to settle the Loss with the Insureds and their representatives. Stillwater has made the practice of valuing a claim near or below the value of an insured’s deductible to avoid having to fairly and honestly adjust and pay for losses. Further, Stillwater failed to assign an adequate adjusting team (field adjuster, contractor consultants, and desk adjusters) to handle the size and scope of the loss. Stillwater does not have appropriate standards in place to be able to investigate claims such as the Loss at the Insureds’ Property. Stillwater’s failure to have appropriate standards led to the assignment of an inadequate adjusting team, which ultimately led to Stillwater’s unfair and dishonest adjustment of the Loss. The Insureds, at their own expense, retained a qualified adjusting team to investigate the Loss. The experienced adjusting team arrived at a drastically different conclusion than Stillwater’s inadequate adjustment team – specifically, Stillwater determined the total value of the loss to be $8,723.55, whereas the experienced and qualified adjusting team retained by the Insureds determined the total value of the Loss to be $103,531.27. To date, Stillwater has failed to accept and fully perform its obligations under the operable insurance contract. The Property remains damaged because the Insureds have not been paid the necessary, covered insurance proceeds sufficient to return the Property to its pre-loss condition. By stating the above detailed facts, it is clear that Stillwater has violated the following Florida statutes: • 624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its Insureds and with due regard for their interest; • 624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage; • 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims; • 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims, by failing to respond to the Insureds’ public adjuster, and Insureds’ counsel with respect to supplemental requests for payments; • 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the Insureds and/or their public adjuster of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for the offer of a compromise settlement; This notice is given in order to perfect the right to pursue the civil remedy authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes, should Stillwater fail to cure the violations set forth in this Civil Remedy Notice within the given cure period. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, Stillwater must: (1) Immediately tender all proceeds due and owing to the Insureds that are fairly owed to the Insureds under the insurance policy that would reasonably compensate the Insureds in order to put the loss property back to its pre-loss condition; the Insureds’ representative has provided their estimate and roof bids for the repairs in the total amount of $103,531.27 (2) Immediately afford coverage for the repairs to the subject property roof and interior necessary to put the property back into its pre-loss condition (3) Agree to reimburse the Insureds’ reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for having to become involved to resolve the claim; and (4) Agree to reimburse the Insureds for interest on the amount of benefits that was found to be?due and owing to the Insured, relating back to the date of loss
Comments
User Id Date Added Comment
rl@weklaw.com 02-03-2025 The Complainant, David Munoz, notifies the Florida Department of Financial Services that this claim has been resolved and that the Civil Remedy Notice is hereby withdrawn.
bob@monsonfirm.com 01-16-2025 Please allow this to serve as Stillwater Insurance Company’s (“STILLWATER”) response to the Civil Remedy Notice (“CRN”) filed by attorney Rebecca Lewis, Esq. of the Weisser Elazar & Kantor law firm on behalf of DAVID MUNOZ, filing number 793302. Of note, the insurance claim which is the subject of the Notice is pending litigation in a lawsuit filed by PATRICIA SANTOS and DAVID MUNOZ (“the Insureds”) in November 17, 2023 in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida bearing Case Number 2023-CA-016933 (“the Lawsuit”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, STILLWATER objects to the notice, as it is not in compliance with Florida Statutes and should be rejected. These include, but are not limited to, the failure of the notice to: (*) Contain specific allegations with specific factual support for the allegations asserted. (*) State a specific amount sought to cure the allegations in the notice. The foregoing notwithstanding, after reviewing the Notice, STILLWATER has conducted a thorough review and evaluation of its handling of Claim Number HO0001047034. STILLWATER denies any and all reasons for the Notice, including all of the following allegations: (*) Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer (*) Claim Denial (*) Unfair Trade Practice STILLWATER denies that it violated any statutes, administrative code provisions, or ethical rules or obligations in connection with its investigation and handling of the claim, specifically including, but not limited to: (*) 624.155(1)(b)(1); (*) 624.155(1)(b)(3); (*) 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a); (*) 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b); (*) 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c); (*) 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d); (*) 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f); At all times, STILLWATER acted in good faith, fairly and honestly towards its Insureds, with due regard for the interests of its Insureds. STILLWATER denies each and every alleged violation set forth in the Notice. The Notice consists almost entirely of boilerplate allegations and completely fails to allege specific acts or omissions on the part of STILLWATER which would violate any applicable statute or regulations. The Notice contains no case-specific factual allegations whatsoever and consists entirely of vague and unsubstantiated allegations. None of the allegations in the Notice have any basis whatsoever in fact or in law. The allegations are false. STILLWATER specifically denies each and every allegation contained in the Notice. The history of this claim clearly establishes that STILLWATER handled the claim correctly. Claim Number HO0001047034 was reported to STILLWATER on or about October 4, 2022, alleging Hurricane Ian damage to the subject property. STILLWATER promptly sent correspondence to the Insureds acknowledging receipt of the Claim as well as providing the Insureds with the Homeowner Claims Bill of Rights. Following an investigation, on October 28, 2022 STILLWATER sent correspondence to the Insureds advising the claim did not qualify for payment pursuant to the policy of insurance. That same correspondence requested the Insureds send any additional information and/or documentation which the Insureds wished STILLWATER to further consider. The Insureds then engaged the services of a public adjuster and submitted additional information and documentation. Thereafter, STILLWATER sent correspondence to the Insureds advising that the claim qualified, in part, for payment and issued payment. That same correspondence requested the Insureds send any additional information and/or documentation which the Insureds wished STILLWATER to further consider. The insureds then engaged the services of the Weisser Elazar & Kantor law firm law firm who filed a Property Insurance Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigation. STILLWATER timely responded to the Property Insurance Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigation and the lawsuit followed. The lawsuit remains pending resolution and the extent of coverage and damages are in dispute, with this Notice having filed midstream of same. These facts indicate STILLWATER has at all times promptly and properly investigated and adjusted this loss. This matter is simply a dispute as to the existence of coverage and the amount of covered loss, if any, which in no way rises to the level of a violation of any statute or regulation. Based on the foregoing, STILLWATER has not violated any of the statutes or regulations identified in the Civil Remedy Notice. The Notice requests demands that are improper according to Florida law and Fla. Stat. §624.155. See Talat Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 753 So. 2d 1278, 1281 (Fla. 2000). The Talat decision provides that a “cure” must be limited to contract damages. To the extent the Notice requests anything other than contract proceeds, the Notice is defective, and the Notice should be rejected. For all the reasons stated above, STILLWATER requests that the Notice be rejected for its failure to comply with Fla. Stat. §624.155 and Florida law. If the Notice is not rejected, STILLWATER denies each and every allegation in the Notice. STILLWATER does not waive or intend to waive any rights or remedies that it may have with respect to the claims of PATRICIA SANTOS and DAVID MUNOZ. STILLWATER specifically reserves all of its rights and defenses under the subject policy and under Florida law. STILLWATER does not waive any of the terms, conditions, limitations, or exclusions of the policy.
Acknowledgement
* The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed or deleted.




DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008