Filing Number: 802717
|
| Filing Accepted: 1/21/2025 |
| Last/Business Name
*
|
|
|
POWELL
|
|
First Name |
|
DAVID AND JOYCE |
|
| Street Address
*
|
|
2881 SE SAINT LUCIE BLVD. |
| City, State Zip
*
|
|
STUART,
FL
34997
|
| Email Address
*
|
|
LITIGATION@THEFREEMANLAWFIRMPA.COM |
| Complainant Type:
*
|
|
Insured |
|
| Last/Business Name* |
|
POWELL |
|
First Name |
|
DAVID AND JOYCE |
| Policy # * |
|
FPH3-000139162 |
|
Claim #* |
|
10000114691 |
|
Attorney is Applicable
|
| Last Name* |
FREEMAN
First Name *
BRIAN
Initial
|
| Street Address* |
|
4245 FOWLER STREET |
| City, State Zip* |
|
FORT MYERS
,
FLORIDA
33901
|
| Email Address * |
|
LITIGATION@THEFREEMANLAWFIRMPA.COM |
|
|
| Insurer Type
*
|
|
Authorized Insurer
Unauthorized Insurer
|
|
|
| Insurer Name |
|
|
| Insurer Name* |
|
FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
| Insurer Name* |
|
|
| Street Address* |
|
|
| City, State Zip* |
|
,
|
|
NAIC Company Code 10897 |
|
|
| Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):*
TEMIKA LESLIE
|
| Type of Insurance
*
Residential Property & Casualty
|
|
|
| Reason for Notice
*
|
|
Claim Delay
|
|
Claim Denial
|
|
Unfair Trade Practice
|
|
Other
:
Bad Faith
|
|
|
*
Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
|
|
|
| 624.155(1)(b)(1) |
|
Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
|
| 624.155(1)(b)(3) |
|
Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) |
|
Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) |
|
Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) |
|
Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) |
|
Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) |
|
Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(g) |
|
Failing to promptly notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(h) |
|
Failing to clearly explain the nature of the requested information and the reasons why such information is necessary.
|
|
*
Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.
The Insureds are in possession of a copy of their insurance policy and believe their Insurance Policy language relevant to the violations includes all applicable insurance policy coverages, loss payment provisions, valuation provisions and other terms and conditions of Insurance Policy No.FPH3-000139162. In particular, the Insureds refer to the following insurance policy coverages included in their insurance policy:
SECTION I – PROPERTY COVERAGES
A. Coverage A – Dwelling
1. We cover:
a. The dwelling on the "residence premises"
shown in the Declarations, including
structures attached to the dwelling; and
b. Materials and supplies located on or next to
the "residence premises" used to construct,
alter or repair the dwelling or other
structures on the "residence premises".
2. We do not cover land, including land on which
the dwelling is located.
B. Coverage B – Other Structures
1. We cover other structures on the "residence
premises" set apart from the dwelling by clear
space. This includes structures connected to
the dwelling by only a fence, utility line, or
similar connection.
2. We do not cover:
a. Land, including land on which the other
structures are located;
b. Other structures rented or held for rental to
any person not a tenant of the dwelling,
unless used solely as a private garage;
c. Other structures from which any "business"
is conducted; or
d. Other structures used to store "business"
property. However, we do cover a structure
that contains "business" property solely
owned by an "insured" or a tenant of the
dwelling, provided that "business" property
does not include gaseous or liquid fuel,
other than fuel in a permanently installed
fuel tank of a vehicle or craft parked or
stored in the structure.
3. The limit of liability for this coverage will not be
more than 10% of the limit of liability that
applies to Coverage A. Use of this coverage
does not reduce the Coverage A limit of
liability.
D. Loss Settlement
In this Condition D., the terms "cost to repair or
replace" and "replacement cost" do not include
the increased costs incurred to comply with the
enforcement of any ordinance or law, except to
the extent that coverage for these increased costs
is provided in E.11. Ordinance Or Law under
Section I – Property Coverages. Covered property
losses are settled as follows:
1. Property of the following types:
a. Personal property;
b. Awnings, carpeting, household appliances,
outdoor antennas and outdoor equipment,
whether or not attached to buildings;
c. Structures that are not buildings; and
d. Grave markers, including mausoleums;
at actual cash value at the time of loss but not
more than the amount required to repair or
replace.
2. Buildings covered under Coverage A or B at
replacement cost without deduction for
depreciation, subject to the following:
a. If, at the time of loss, the amount of
insurance in this policy on the damaged
building is 80% or more of the full
replacement cost of the building
immediately before the loss, we will pay the
cost to repair or replace, without deduction
for depreciation, but not more than the least
of the following amounts:
(1) The limit of liability under this policy that
applies to the building;
(2) The replacement cost of that part of the
building damaged with material of like
kind and quality and for like use; or
(3) The necessary amount actually spent to
repair or replace the damaged building.
If the building is rebuilt at a new premises,
the cost described in (2) above is limited to
the cost which would have been incurred if
the building had been built at the original
premises.
b. If, at the time of loss, the amount of
insurance in this policy on the damaged
building is less than 80% of the full
replacement cost of the building
immediately before the loss, we will pay the
greater of the following amounts, but not
more than the limit of liability under this
policy that applies to the building:
(1) The actual cash value of that part of the
building damaged; or
(2) That proportion of the cost to repair or
replace, without deduction for
depreciation, that part of the building
damaged, which the total amount of
insurance in this policy on the damaged
building bears to 80% of the
replacement cost of the building.
c. To determine the amount of insurance
required to equal 80% of the full
replacement cost of the building
immediately before the loss, do not include
the value of:
(1) Excavations, footings, foundations,
piers, or any other structures or devices
that support all or part of the building,
which are below the undersurface of the
lowest basement floor;
(2) Those supports described in (1) above
which are below the surface of the
ground inside the foundation walls, if
there is no basement; and
(3) Underground flues, pipes, wiring and
drains.
d. We will pay no more than the actual cash
value of the damage until actual repair or
replacement is complete. Once actual
repair or replacement is complete, we will
settle the loss as noted in 2.a. and b.
above.
However, if the cost to repair or replace the
damage is both:
(1) Less than 5% of the amount of
insurance in this policy on the building;
and
(2) Less than $2,500;
we will settle the loss as noted in 2.a. and
b. above whether or not actual repair or
replacement is complete.
e. You may disregard the replacement cost
loss settlement provisions and make claim
under this policy for loss to buildings on an
actual cash value basis. You may then
make claim for any additional liability
according to the provisions of this Condition
D. Loss Settlement, provided you notify us,
within 180 days after the date of loss, of
your intent to repair or replace the
damaged building.
J. Loss Payment
We will adjust all losses with you. We will pay you
unless some other person is named in the policy
or is legally entitled to receive payment. Loss will
be payable 60 days after we receive your proof of
loss and:
1. Reach an agreement with you;
2. There is an entry of a final judgment; or
3. There is a filing of an appraisal award with us.
|
| |
*
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.
During the policy period, on May 19, 2024, the Insureds’ home located at 2881 SE Saint Lucie Blvd. Stuart, FL 34997, owned by David and Joyce Powell ("Insureds"), suffered windstorm related physical and structural damage, a covered loss under the subject insurance policy. Please see insurance policy language above that indicates insurance coverage for windstorm damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system as a direct result of a windstorm.
Subsequent to the windstorm, the Insureds immediately reported the loss to their insurance carrier, First Protective Insurance Company, ("Insurer"). Since the beginning of the claims process, the Insureds fully cooperated in the Insurer's investigation of the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim.
Despite overwhelming evidence the Insureds’ home and roof system had been significantly physically and structurally damaged by a windstorm, all covered losses under the subject insurance policy; the Insurer unreasonably and improperly investigated, inspected, evaluated, adjusted and failed to pay the correct amount of damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system. The Insurer performed a completely inadequate investigation of the damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system.
The Insurer retained adjuster Johnny Richemond (“Mr. Richemond”), to inspect the windstorm damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system. Mr. Richemond documented windstorm damage to the Insureds’ screen enclosure, but failed to document the extensive damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system. Mr. Richemond prepared a damage estimate totaling a mere $278.57 for all of the windstorm damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system.
On August 14, 2024, the Insurer sent correspondence to the Insureds informing the Insureds their windstorm damage claim was partially denied. The Insurer based its decision solely on an inspection from a field adjuster, but refused to provide any report prepared as a result of the Insurer’s inspection.
The Insureds retained, at their own expense, Aaron Penn, (“Mr. Penn”), of Archer Claims to inspect their home and roof system for windstorm damage. During his inspection, Mr. Penn documented extensive physical and structural windstorm damage to the Insureds’ roof system, exterior damage and damage to the Insureds’ windows. As a result of Mr. Penn’s inspection, Mr. Penn provided the Insureds with a damage estimate in the sum of $225,227.53.
The Insurer did not extend coverage for the clearly evident damage as a direct result of the windstorm as set forth in Mr. Penn’s damage estimate. The Insurer failed to extend full coverage for the Insureds’ clearly evident windstorm damage, indicating the Insurer does not have proper standards for investigating the proper scope and amount of damage caused by a covered loss. The Insureds provided all the evidence necessary supporting the actual costs associated with the complete replacement of their roof system and the amount necessary to repair the interior and exterior damage to their home in order to restore their home to its pre-loss condition. However, despite this evidence and information, the Insurer failed and refused to pay for the Insureds’ damage in order to restore their home to its pre-loss condition.
Moreover, the Insurer did not perform a legally sufficient windstorm damage investigation by failing to perform a substantial structural damage investigation and determination as required by The Florida Building Code and failing to retain a licensed Florida Professional Engineer to investigate the full extent of physical and structural damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system as a direct result of the windstorm. The Insurers failure to perform this very important substantial structural damage determination and failed to retain a licensed Florida Professional Engineer to assist the Insurer in its investigation of this windstorm damage claim further indicates the Insurer did not comply with the basic requirements inherent in the proper investigation of windstorm damage claims, and instead performs inadequate and incomplete investigations in order to improperly partially deny valid claims.
The Insureds provided the Insurer with an overwhelming amount of evidence to support the extensive physical and structural damage to their home and roof system and other windstorm related damage to their home and a comprehensive damage estimate from Mr. Penn. Notwithstanding, the Insurer failed and refused to pay the amount necessary to restore their home to its pre-loss condition.
The work of adjusting insurance claims in Florida engages the public trust. In the instant case, the Insurer breached this duty through its complete failure to properly investigate, inspect, evaluate, adjust and pay the windstorm damage claim of the Insureds. The Insurer's failure to properly inspect, investigate, evaluate, adjust and pay for the damage to the Insureds’ home and roof system, failure to communicate with the Insureds, and improper handling of the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim clearly indicates the Insurer failed to adopt and implement proper standards for the investigation, evaluation and adjustment of claims; failed to properly train, manage, supervise and promote claims adjusters so Insureds, such as the Insureds in this case, receive good faith, fair and prompt adjustment of claims; and failed to conduct a full and fair investigation of this windstorm damage claim. The Insurer furthermore failed to provide full reasons and facts to the Insureds for the partial denial of their windstorm damage claim resulting in the statutory violations as set forth in this notice.
The Insurer also breached its duty to the Insureds by failing to timely and promptly pay the correct indemnity owed to its Insureds. This duty is owed by the Insurer to its Insureds and is inherent in the insurance claims process. The Insureds promptly provided all the necessary documentation, evidence and information for a timely resolution of their windstorm damage claim, including an itemized damage estimate from Mr. Penn and extensive documentation of the damage to their home as a direct result of the windstorm to the Insurer which clearly shows the damage to the Insureds’ home exceeds the grossly inadequate undisputed amount of damage the Insurer documented to the Insureds’ home and failed to provide a detailed damage estimate of such damages documented by the Insurer to the Insureds. To date, the Insurer failed to provide timely and prompt payment for the correct amount of the Insureds’ damage.
To date, the Insureds performed all conditions precedent required of them under their insurance policy with the Insurer and under Florida law. However, the Insurer and its agents failed and refused to properly investigate, inspect, evaluate, adjust and pay the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim and failed to tender all insurance proceeds due and owing to the Insureds under the subject insurance policy. Due to the Insurer's intentional delay and insufficient investigation of the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim, the Insureds were forced to obtain legal counsel at a significant cost and expense to attempt to recover what they are legally owed under their insurance policy with the Insurer. The concept of insurance is that it is the insurer's granting of timely and prompt indemnity or
security against a contingent loss. Fla. Stat. § 624.02 defines insurance as a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay or allow a specified amount or a determinable benefit upon determinable contingencies. Inherent is the fact that payment must be made timely and promptly so that an Insureds may mitigate their damages and be put back into the position they were in prior to the loss as quickly as possible. Simply put, the Insurer failed to comply with its duty to indemnify the Insureds and breached the insurance policy.
The Insurer failed and refused to properly investigate, inspect, evaluate, adjust and pay the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim. The Insurer failed and refused to pay the correct amount of insurance proceeds to date owed to the Insureds as required by the insurance policy and Florida law. Refusal and failure to pay the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim, when under all the circumstances it could have and should have done so had it acted fairly and honestly towards the Insureds is a breach of the insurance policy and a violation of Florida Law.
The actions taken by the Insurer in the handling and adjustment of the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim were willful, wanton, and in disregard of the rights of its Insureds and occur with such a frequency as to indicate a general unfair and deceptive business practice in violation of Florida Statutes § 624.155 and § 626.9541.
Based on the foregoing actions and omissions, the Insurer engaged in wrongful claims handling conduct, including but not limited to, the following:
1) Improper claim denial;
2) Improper claim delays;
3) Not conducting a full and fair investigation of the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim;
4) Looking for ways to deny recovery to the Insureds;
5) Overlooking covered damages to the Insureds’ home and roof system and failing to retain a professional engineer if causation was in question;
6) Failing to pay the necessary amounts due and owing to restore the Insureds’ home to its pre-loss condition;
7) Not adjusting the claim and not evaluating the loss properly, promptly and fairly so as to provide full and prompt indemnity to its Insureds;
8) Failing to implement proper standards for the adjustment and investigation of insurance claims;
9) Failing to pay the requisite monies owed for the Insureds’ loss, despite receipt of a detailed damage estimate from Mr. Penn and supporting documentation;
10) Not training, supervising or managing adjusters and independent contractors properly so that prompt and full payments are made, but rather placing the company’s interests before the policyholders’ interests by attempting to deny or minimize payments owed;
11) Establishing severity control initiatives and otherwise establishing a culture of not fully and promptly paying claims following losses.
The Insurer violated the statutes set forth above based on the conduct described herein. The Insurer failed and refused to tender insurance proceeds required by its insurance policy with its Insureds. In addition, the Insurer failed to reasonably and properly pay and resolve the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim for money damages when under all the facts and circumstances, it could have and should have done so if it had acted fairly and honestly towards its Insureds. The Insurer’s improper actions are well documented and have occurred with such frequency as to constitute a general unfair and deceptive business practice and were made in a reckless disregard for its Insureds’ rights. The Insurer placed its interest above and before the Insureds’ interest in this matter. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, the Insurer must do the following:
A. Immediately pay the Insureds’ windstorm damage claim in the amount of the Mr. Penn’s damage estimate of $225,227.53, plus interest, less the applicable deductible.
B. Agree to tender any recoverable depreciation once it has been incurred per the terms of the insurance policy.
|
|
*
|
The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the
person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.
Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered
correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed
or deleted.
|
DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008
|