Filing Number: 806637
|
| Filing Accepted: 2/12/2025 |
| Last/Business Name
*
|
|
|
HENNESSY
|
|
First Name |
|
KIMBERLY |
|
| Street Address
*
|
|
3505 LEGACY HILLS COURT |
| City, State Zip
*
|
|
LONGWOOD,
FL
32779
|
| Email Address
*
|
|
INTAKE2@THEKRFIRM.COM |
| Complainant Type:
*
|
|
Insured |
|
| Last/Business Name* |
|
HENNESSY |
|
First Name |
|
KIMBERLY |
| Policy # * |
|
8420886236 |
|
Claim #* |
|
01000084995 |
|
Attorney is Applicable
|
| Last Name* |
KADIR
First Name *
ALI
Initial
A.
|
| Street Address* |
|
986 DOUGLAS AVE, STE. 102 |
| City, State Zip* |
|
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
,
FL
32714
|
| Email Address * |
|
INTAKE2@THEKRFIRM.COM |
|
|
| Insurer Type
*
|
|
Authorized Insurer
Unauthorized Insurer
|
|
|
| Insurer Name |
|
|
| Insurer Name* |
|
FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
|
| Insurer Name* |
|
|
| Street Address* |
|
|
| City, State Zip* |
|
,
|
|
NAIC Company Code 10897 |
|
|
| Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):*
TABITHA WORTHEY, GRAHAM WAAK, AND ALL FRONTLINE CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS, VENDORS, AND/OR ENGINEERS WHO HANDLED THE CLAIM.
|
| Type of Insurance
*
Residential Property & Casualty
|
|
|
| Reason for Notice
*
|
|
Non-renewal
|
|
Claim Denial
|
|
Claim Delay
|
|
Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer
|
|
Unfair Trade Practice
|
|
Other
:
Misrepresentation
|
|
|
*
Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
|
|
|
| 624.155(1)(b)(1) |
|
Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
|
| 624.155(1)(b)(3) |
|
Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) |
|
Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(b) |
|
Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) |
|
Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(d) |
|
Denying claims without conducting reasonable investigations based upon available information.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(e) |
|
Failing to affirm or deny full or partial coverage of claims, and, as to partial coverage, the dollar amount or extent of coverage, or failing to provide a written statement that the claim is being investigated, upon the written request of the insured within 30 days after proof-of-loss statements have been completed.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) |
|
Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(g) |
|
Failing to promptly notify the insured of any additional information necessary for the processing of a claim.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(h) |
|
Failing to clearly explain the nature of the requested information and the reasons why such information is necessary.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(4) |
|
Failing to pay undisputed amounts of partial or full benefits owed under first-party property insurance policies within 60 days after an insurer receives notice of a residential property insurance claim, determines the amounts of partial or full benefits, and agrees to coverage, unless payment of the undisputed benefits is prevented by factors beyond the control of the insurer as defined in s. 627.70131(5).
|
|
*
Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.
“D. Coverage D – Loss of Use
. . . .
1. Additional Living Expenses
If a loss covered under Section I makes that part of the “residence premises” where you reside not fit to live in, we cover any necessary increase in in living expenses incurred by you so that your household can maintain its normal standard of living.
. . . .
E. Additional Coverages
. . . .
11. Ordinance or Law
a. You may use up to 10% of the limit of liability that applies to Coverage A for the increased costs you incur due to the enforcement of any ordinance or law which requires or regulates:
(1) The construction, demolition, remodeling, renovation or repair of that part of a covered building or other structure damaged by a Peril Insured Against.
. . . .
b. You may use all or part of this ordinance or law coverage to pay for the increased costs you incur to remove debris resulting from construction, demolition, remodeling, renovation, repair or replacement of property as stated in a. above.
. . . .
SECTION I PERILS INSURED AGAINST
A. Coverage A – Dwelling And Coverage B – Other Structures
1. We insure against direct physical loss to property described in Coverages A and B.”
|
| |
*
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.
Kimberly Hennessy is a homeowner insured with an all-risks policy issued by First Protective Insurance Company dba Frontline Insurance (“Frontline”). The insured property or home is located at 3505 Legacy Hills Court, Longwood, Florida 32779.
In September of 2022, Hurricane Ian caused extensive damage to Ms. Hennessy’s home. Ms. Hennessy timely reported an insurance claim for this damage to Frontline and fully cooperated with all requests for inspections. She provided all requested documentation, if any, and complied with all post loss policy conditions.
After reporting the claim, Frontline retained an unqualified and biased field adjuster who has a financial relationship with Frontline. This field adjuster inspected Ms. Hennessy’s home in an apparent effort to minimize Frontline’s losses instead of adjusting the claim in good faith in due regard for Ms. Hennessy’s interests.
Ms. Hennessy’s claim eventually went to Appraisal pursuant to the policy terms and an Appraisal Award payment was issued; however, said Appraisal Award did not address all damages, including both Additional Living Expenses (ALE) and Ordinance & Law (O & L), which she has incurred. Said Appraisal Award specifically stated "NOT ADDRESSED" for both ALE and O & L. And despite Frontline’s admission to coverage, it refused to pay for Ms. Hennessy’s remaining damages. Due to such, Ms. Hennessy has not been able to permanently repair her home. Indeed, numerous invoices evidencing her remaining damages such as invoices for: window temporary repairs and restoration/rebuild, testing, pressure washing, re-paint, and window cover removal/re-cover for inspections; as well as invoices for shutter replacement/installation; mold remediation, monthly rent for rental home, pet boarding, and a post-installation cleaning quote were all prepared on behalf of Ms. Hennessy totaling $239,934.54 and were submitted to Frontline; all of which have gone ignored to date.
Based on these facts, it is clear Frontline unreasonably denied full coverage for Ms. Hennessy’s claim in bad faith through its extremely low and unreasonable undervaluation of her claim. Had Frontline conducted a reasonable investigation based upon the available information, it would have been evident that affording greater coverage and issuing a substantially higher payment is warranted. Instead, it failed to adopt and implement standards for proper claim investigation as well as misrepresented pertinent policy provisions/facts rather than act fairly and/or honestly with Ms. Hennessy in due regard for her interests. Frontline also delayed the claim and failed to timely respond to communications. This has become a common business practice of Frontline.
Florida Statute § 624.02 defines insurance as a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay or allow a specified amount or a determinable benefit based on determinable contingencies. Inherent is the fact that payment must be made timely and promptly so that insureds may mitigate their damages and be put back into the position they were in prior to the loss as quickly as possible. Frontline has breached this duty by refusing to properly and timely adjust the loss.
As a result, Ms. Hennessy will have no choice but to retain the undersigned counsel to file a lawsuit against Frontline.
Frontline has more than enough information and is still refusing to accept coverage for this claim. This continued and repeated reckless claim delay and denial of coverage will result in a significant punitive damage award if a bad faith lawsuit is filed.
Frontline further mailed Ms. Hennessy a Notice of Nonrenewal. On this Notice of Nonrenewal, it lists the "DATE ISSUED" as 01/11/2025 and the "Expiration Date" as 05/16/2025 at 12:01 AM.
Frontline can avoid a lawsuit for bad faith by immediately accepting full coverage under the subject insurance policy for this claim and by paying Ms. Hennessy $207,934.54, which is the policy limit for coverage A less the 2% hurricane deductible.
|
|
*
|
The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the
person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.
Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered
correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed
or deleted.
|
DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008
|