Civil Remedy Notice of Insurer Violations
Login

Filing Number:     808832
Filing Accepted:  2/27/2025
         Print Filing
Complainant
Last/Business Name *  
SANDERS   First Name   HOUSTON AND GAIL
Street Address * 5131 CLARENDON ROAD
City, State Zip * JACKSONVILLE, FL 32205
Email Address * WITHHELD
Complainant Type: * Insured
Insured
Last/Business Name*   SANDERS   First Name   HOUSTON AND GAIL
Policy # * KIN-DP-FL-208095348 Claim #* HO-3431843
Attorney
Attorney is Applicable
Last Name* DE LAS SALAS First Name * GABRIEL Initial M
Street Address* 1930 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 204
City, State Zip* HOLLYWOOD , FLORIDA 33020
Email Address * GMS@GMSLAWYER.COM
Violation
Insurer Type *   Authorized Insurer Unauthorized Insurer
 
Insurer Name*   KIN INTERINSURANCE NETWORK
NAIC Company Code 16603
 
Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):* BETINA FOSTER, PAUL ALDRICH AND ALL OTHER ADJUSTERS INVOLVED IN THE ADJUSTMENT OF THIS CLAIM.
Type of Insurance * Residential Property & Casualty   
Reason for Notice *
Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer
Other : Bad Faith
Other : Unfair Claim Settlement Practices
Other : Breach(es) of the Adjuster Code of Ethics
* Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
 
624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
626.9541(1)(i)(4) Failing to pay undisputed amounts of partial or full benefits owed under first-party property insurance policies within 60 days after an insurer receives notice of a residential property insurance claim, determines the amounts of partial or full benefits, and agrees to coverage, unless payment of the undisputed benefits is prevented by factors beyond the control of the insurer as defined in s. 627.70131(5).
* Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

Policies must be read in their entirety. Accordingly, the entire policy is relevant to the violation. Specifically: We agree to provide the insurance coverages indicated on the Policy Declarations in return for payment of your premium when due and compliance with all policy terms and conditions. We make this agreement in reliance upon the information you have provided us and require that you inform us within 60 days of any change of title, use or occupancy of the “described location”. 13. Loss Payment. We will adjust all losses with you. Claims payments issued for damage under Coverage A – Dwelling or Coverage B – Other Structures will be made payable to all Named Insureds and applicable mortgagees listed on the Declarations page of this policy and your assignee(s). In the event that any repair services were performed under the Our Option provision, KIN DP EWR, KIN DP DRF, or KIN DP DRL, we will pay the retained contractor directly for those services or part or portion of any services the retained contractor performs or provides. For all other claims payments we will pay you unless some other person is named in the policy or is legally entitled to receive payment. Loss will be payable upon the earliest of the following: a. Only if “we” request a proof of loss from “you” pursuant to CONDITIONS 4 Your Duties After Loss a.6), twenty (20) days after “we” receive ”our” requested written proof of loss and reach a written, executed agreement with “you” according to the terms of the written agreement; or b. Only if “we” request a proof of loss from “you” pursuant to CONDITIONS 4 Your Duties After Loss a.6), sixty (60) days after “we” receive “our” requested written proof of loss and: 1) There is an entry of a final judgment; or 2) There is a filing of an appraisal award or a mediation settlement with us. Reasonable Emergency Measures will be payable in accordance with Other Coverages 6. Reasonable Emergency Measurers. You are responsible for all applicable deductibles. The following form/endorsement: KIN FL DP RSP 01 23.
 
* Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.

Failure to act in good faith to resolve and pay the claim; Failure to promptly and properly investigate the subject claim; Failure to properly adjust the loss; Failure to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims; Failure to issue payment of undisputed amounts within 90 days of the claim being reported after an insurer determines the amount of benefits and agrees to coverage; Placing financial interest of insurer before that of policyholders and claimants; and, Breaches of the adjuster code of ethics. The reasons for the foregoing may be attributed to improper training, supervision, and/or motivation of adjusters and claims supervisors to promptly and fairly investigate, adjust and pay full benefits available to all beneficiaries. The insurer failed to adopt proper standards of investigation and adjustment of losses or is otherwise not implementing those standards because the insurer is not acting with honesty and integrity. The insurer’s acts and/or omissions, as detailed in this CRN, are committed and/or performed with such frequency as to indicate they are general business practices. Houston Sanders and Gail Sanders (hereinafter the “insureds”) purchased a property insurance policy, Policy Number (hereinafter the “Subject Policy”) from Kin Interinsurance Network (hereinafter “Kin Interinsurance Network”) which, at all times material hereto, provided property insurance for the property located at 5131 Clarendon Road, Jacksonville, FL 32205 (hereinafter the “Subject Property”). On or about September 14, 2024, , a covered cause of loss, caused direct physical loss and ensuing damages to the Subject Property. The insureds timely notified Kin Interinsurance Network of the loss. Kin Interinsurance Network assigned claim number to the loss (hereinafter the "claim"). The insurer acknowledged coverage for the loss. However, it improperly concluded the loss did not exceed the applicable deductible. As such, there is solely a dispute as to the amount of loss. The insureds, by and through their public adjusters, attempted to reach a resolution of the dispute as to the amount of loss. However, the insurer failed to engage in conversations to amicably resolve this matter in such a manner that would result if a full and final resolution of the claim. For these reasons, and those stated in detail above, the insurer is failing to act in good faith; specifically, failure/refusal to engage in discussions to reach full and final resolution of claim. The adjuster(s) involved in this claim have breached the adjuster code of ethics as found in 69B-220.201, F.A.C. In addition to the statutes cited in this CRN, the adjusters involved in this claim breached the adjuster code of ethics as set forth in 69B-220.201, F.A.C. Pursuant to the code, a breach of any of provision of the ethical rules constitutes unfair claims settlement practices. They have breached the following ethical obligation as set forth in 69B-220.201, F.A.C.: an adjuster shall act with dispatch and due diligence in achieving a proper disposition of the claim. The adjusters involved in this claim have breached this ethical obligation due to their failure to ensure payment was issued in accordance with the policy and Florida law and in an amount which reasonably restores the insured(s) to their pre-loss condition. Due to the aforementioned facts and circumstances, and those more fully stated in detail above, the insurer’s adjusters breached the adjuster code of ethics. Accordingly, this ethical breach constitutes an unfair claims settlement practice as provided in 69B-220.201, F.A.C. The circumstances giving rising to the violations can be cured if the insurer: (1) tenders payment to the insured in the amount $26,692.34, (2) acknowledges the insured’s entitlement to prejudgment interest and tenders payment for this interest, and (3) acknowledges and stipulates to the insured’s entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs. If the insurer disagrees with the extent of the cure requested or asserts that the payment of any of the above cure categories may not be required, the insurer should cure to the extent it believes it must under the Policy and Florida law to correct the allegations of bad faith contained herein. While it is not being requested as a cure for the bad faith alleged herein, the insured remains willing to entertain any reasonable counteroffer of settlement.
Comments
User Id Date Added Comment
kristen.henderson@kin.com 03-24-2025 While Kin Interinsurance Network believes that the Civil Remedy Notice fails to comply with the requirements of Florida Statute §624.155 and Florida Case law, it has responded to the Notice in writing to GMS Lawyers on March 24, 2025. Pursuant to F.S. 624.155(3)(d), please accept this notice on the disposition of the alleged violations contained in the Civil Remedy Notice occurred on March 12, 2025.
Acknowledgement
* The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.

Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed or deleted.




DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008