Filing Number: 809514
|
| Filing Accepted: 3/4/2025 |
| Last/Business Name
*
|
|
|
ZUNIGA AND RODRIGUEZ
|
|
First Name |
|
LUIS AND LILIANA |
|
| Street Address
*
|
|
5740 LAKESIDE LANDINGS BOULEVARD |
| City, State Zip
*
|
|
WINTER HAVEN,
FL
33881
|
| Email Address
*
|
|
WITHHELD |
| Complainant Type:
*
|
|
Insured |
|
| Last/Business Name* |
|
ZUNIGA AND RODRIGUEZ |
|
First Name |
|
LUIS AND LILIANA |
| Policy # * |
|
ARK158063 |
|
Claim #* |
|
1324788-241013 |
|
Attorney is Applicable
|
| Last Name* |
SIGEL
First Name *
MELANIE
Initial
|
| Street Address* |
|
800 E. BROWARD BLVD. STE. 510 |
| City, State Zip* |
|
FORT LAUDERDALE
,
FL
33301
|
| Email Address * |
|
MDS@WEKLAW.COM |
|
|
| Insurer Type
*
|
|
Authorized Insurer
Unauthorized Insurer
|
|
|
| Insurer Name |
|
|
| Insurer Name* |
|
ASI PREFERRED INSURANCE CORP.
|
| Insurer Name* |
|
|
| Street Address* |
|
|
| City, State Zip* |
|
,
|
|
NAIC Company Code 13142 |
|
|
| Name of individual responsible for violation (if any):*
AUBREY WILLIAMS; TRACY BROWN; JEFF EBERLY; VENITTA ROBINSON
|
| Type of Insurance
*
Residential Property & Casualty
|
|
|
| Reason for Notice
*
|
|
Claim Delay
|
|
Unsatisfactory Settlement Offer
|
|
Unfair Trade Practice
|
|
|
*
Statutory provision(s) which the insurer allegedly violated.
|
|
|
| 624.155(1)(b)(1) |
|
Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its insured and with due regard for her or his interests.
|
| 624.155(1)(b)(3) |
|
Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) |
|
Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) |
|
Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims.
|
| 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) |
|
Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the insured of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
|
|
*
Specific policy language that is relevant to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.
COVERAGE A – DWELLING and COVERAGE B –
OTHER STRUCTURES
We insure against risk of direct loss to property described
in Coverages A and B only if that loss is a
physical loss to property.
***
3. Loss Settlement. Covered property losses are
settled as follows:
Under Form HO 00 03, item b.(4) is replaced by the
following:
b.(4) We will pay at least the actual cash value of
the damage, less any applicable deductible,
until actual repair is performed. We will pay
any remaining amounts necessary to
perform such repairs as the work is
performed and the expenses are incurred
and according to the provisions of b.(1) and
b.(2) above.
However, if the cost to repair or replace the
damage is both:
(a) Less than 5% of the amount of
insurance in this policy on the building;
and
(b) Less than $2500;
we will settle the loss according to the
provisions of b.(1) and b.(2) above whether
or not actual repair or replacement is
complete. If a total loss, we will pay the
replacement cost amount without deduction
for depreciation.
***
10. Loss Payment. We will adjust all losses with you.
We will pay you unless some other person is
named in the policy or is legally entitled to receive
payment. Loss will be payable upon the earlier of
the following:
a. 20 days after:
(1) We receive your proof of loss and reach
written agreement with you; or
(2) Written executed mediation settlement
with you according to the terms of the
written mediation settlement; or
b. 60 days after we receive your proof of loss
and:
(1) There is an entry of a final judgment or, in
the case of an appeal from such
judgment, within 60 days from and after
the affirmance of the same by the
appellate court; or
(2) There is a filing of an appraisal award or,
in the case of an appeal from such award,
within 60 days from and after the
affirmance of the same by the appellate
court; or
c. Within 90 days after we receive notice from
you of an initial, reopened, or supplemental
property insurance claim, we shall pay or deny
such claim or a portion of the claim unless the
failure to do so is caused by factors beyond
our control which reasonably prevent such
payment. However, failure to pay or deny
within 90 days does not form the sole basis for
a private cause of action.
***
The following Additional Coverage is added:
11. “Fungi”, Mold, Wet Or Dry Rot, Or Bacteria
a. We will pay up to the amount stated in the Declarations for Limit of Liability for “Fungi” Coverage for:
(1) The total of all loss payable under Section I – Property Coverages caused by or resulting directly
or indirectly from “fungi”, mold, wet or dry rot, or bacteria;
(2) The cost to remove “fungi”, mold, wet or dry rot, or bacteria from property covered under Section I
- Property Coverages.
(3) The cost to tear out and replace any part of the building or other covered property as needed to
gain access to the “fungi”, mold, wet or dry rot, or bacteria; and
(4) The cost of testing of air or property to confirm the absence, presence or level of “fungi”, mold, wet
or dry rot, or bacteria whether performed prior to, during or after removal, repair, restoration or
replacement. The cost of such testing will be provided only to the extent that there is a reason to
believe that there is the presence of “fungi”, mold, wet or dry rot, or bacteria.
b. The coverage described in a. only applies when such loss or costs are a result of a Peril Insured
Against that occurs during the policy period and only if all reasonable means were used to save and
preserve the property from further damage at and after the time the Peril Insured Against occurred.
c. The Each Covered Loss amount shown in the Schedule for this coverage is the most we will pay for
the total of all loss or costs payable under this Additional Coverage resulting from any one covered
loss; and The Policy Aggregate amount shown in the Schedule for this coverage is the most we will pay for the
total of all loss or costs payable under this Additional Coverage for all covered losses, regardless of
the number of locations insured under this endorsement or number of claims-made.
d. If there is a covered loss or damage to covered property, not caused, in whole or in part, by “fungi”,
mold, wet or dry rot, or bacteria, loss payment will not be limited by the terms of this Additional
Coverage, except to the extent that “fungi”, mold, wet or dry rot, or bacteria causes an increase in the
loss. Any such increase in the loss will be subject to the terms of this Additional Coverage.
This coverage does not increase the limit of liability applying to the damaged covered property.
|
| |
*
Facts and circumstances giving rise to the violation.
Enter all words or phrases (one at a time) that should be used to filter.
On March 15, 2024, the insureds reported a water damage claim resulting from a sudden direct physical loss on February 12, 2024. The insurer’s field adjuster grossly undervalued the damages, with ASI issuing a total payment (based on the field adjuster's estimate) of $1,520.77, with a maximum recoverable claim of $3,762.81, despite extensive damage requiring $21,891 in repairs per the insureds' contractor estimate. The insurer’s independent adjuster’s estimate ($6,262.81) failed to account for a full scope of necessary repairs and the replacement of damaged materials rather than minor repairs, and contained a significant underestimation of labor and material costs. The insureds submitted a supplemental request on May 17, 2024, seeking payment for all of their covered damages, but have not received further payment. Additionally, the insureds submitted an estimate for $8,740.51 in mold remediation costs. The insurer’s failure to recognize and pay for this critical remediation creates unnecessary health hazards and exacerbates property damage, in direct contradiction to their obligations under the policy. Further, after the insureds submitted their contractor's rebuild estimate, which established that the carrier's rebuild payment was not sufficient to repair their home and return it to pre-loss condition, the carrier responded on May 31, 2024 that "At this time, we are reviewing your estimate and request for supplemental payment. After review, we will contact your office to discuss our differences and how we can reach an amicable resolution to our client’s claim." However, no further rebuild payments were issued for rebuild and it appears that ASI Preferred did not discuss the differences between the two estimates, conduct a re-inspection, send out a plumber, general contractor, or other specialist, conduct a complete investigation or make any effort to reach an amicable resolution as promised, despite the fact that more than 60 days had passed since the insureds reported the claim. In fact, compounding the delay, the desk adjuster Ms. Williams admitted on June 10, 2024, via email that "the remaining invoices ,mold remediation and mold test, have yet to be reviewed." Again, on August 5 2024, Ms. Williams reiterated "I have not yet reviewed the invoices for mold and mold remediation. I will take a look this week and get back with you." It is not clear if, to date, if the mold remediation documents were ever reviewed. The remediation was certainly not paid, as the carrier failed to fully adjust the claim.
By stating the above detailed facts, it is clear that ASI Preferred has violated the following Florida statutes:
• 624.155(1)(b)(1) Not attempting in good faith to settle claims when, under all the circumstances, it could and should have done so, had it acted fairly and honestly toward its Insured and with due regard for their interest;
• 624.155(1)(b)(3) Except as to liability coverages, failing to promptly settle claims, when the obligation to settle a claim has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage;
• 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(a) Failing to adopt and implement standards for the proper investigation of claims;
• 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(c) Failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications with respect to claims, by failing to respond to the Insured’ public adjuster, and Insured’ counsel with respect to supplemental requests for payments;
• 626.9541(1)(i)(3)(f) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation in writing to the Insured and/or their public adjuster of the basis in the insurance policy, in relation to the facts or applicable law, for the offer of a compromise settlement;
To date, ASI Preferred has failed to accept and fully perform its obligations under the operable insurance contract. The Insureds have not been paid the necessary, covered insurance proceeds sufficient to return the Property to its pre-loss condition. As a direct result of ASI Preferred’s initial insufficient investigation and handling of the claim, failure to extend coverage for all covered damage and subsequent breaches of not only the policy of insurance, but also Florida Statutes, the Insureds had no choice other than to seek the help of licensed professionals to assist them, including, but not limited to legal counsel. Considering the aforementioned conduct, it is irrefutable that ASI Preferred knowingly and intentionally, and in bad faith delays the claims process in order to further disadvantage the Insured. The financial detriment caused to the Insured is a direct result of ASI Preferred’s dismissive, reckless treatment of the claims process. The Insureds submitted all available requested documents in their custody and control in a timely fashion, made their property available for inspection and submitted additional documentation in support of the insurance proceeds sought under their insurance contract. Nevertheless, ASI Preferred failed to properly assess this information and reach the logical conclusion resulting in its gross mismanagement of the claim.
To deny the Insureds the remaining benefits clearly due and owing under the Policy, for which they have time and time again been making premium payments for and after they have satisfied all their obligations is morally and ethically reprehensible, and reeks of Unfair Claims Practice and Bad Faith. Upon information and belief, the above identified actions taken by ASI Preferred, among others, were made so often as to constitute a general business practice, evidencing a motive to enhance ASI Preferred’s profits, and designed to cause a detrimental effect to its policyholders.
This notice is given to perfect the right to pursue the civil remedy authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes, should ASI Preferred fail to cure the violations set forth in this Civil Remedy Notice within the given cure period. Therefore, to cure the defects outlined in this Civil Remedy Notice, ASI Preferred must: (1) Immediately tender all proceeds due and owing to the Insured that are fairly owed to the Insured under the insurance policy that would reasonably compensate the Insured in order to put the loss property back to its pre-loss condition; (2) pay all due and owing outstanding Restoration Control invoices in full for services performed due to the loss; (3) Agree to reimburse the Insured' reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for having to become involved to resolve the claim; (4) Agree to reimburse the Insured for interest on the amount of benefits that was found to be due and owing to the Insured, relating back to the date of loss.
|
|
*
|
The submitter hereby states that this notice is given in order to perfect the rights of the
person(s) damaged to pursue civil remedies authorized by Section 624.155, Florida Statutes.
Before submitting a Notice using this system, please verify that all text has been entered
correctly and completely. Once the Notice has been submitted, the text cannot be changed
or deleted.
|
DFS-10-363
Rev. 10/14/2008
|